有同学在做题的时候觉得没有空白的句子根本也没有看的必要吧。果真如此么？我们看题：

Wolosky claims that Ella Wheeler Wilcox joined other women poets such as Julia Ward Howe, Frances Harper, and Charlotte Perkins Gilman in critiquing materialism and possessive individualism. Wolosky’s description (i)_____ the poetry of Gilman, Howe, and Harper, but it is not entirely (ii)_____ in the case of Wilcox, who hardly (iii)_____ the materialism of her time. Rather, Wilcox seems to have embraced the amassing of private property. 

那么，这个信息有用么？当然！有用。只不过，它的作用需要于题目中的最后一句“Rather, Wilcox seems to have embraced the amassing of private property.”合并起来才充分发挥。那么，我们看看题目中的最后一句告诉我们什么：相反，Wilcox对于积聚私人财产仿佛是拥抱的姿态。

这样一来，题目中的句话与最后一句话的内容正好相互冲突。这个冲突正是我们填空的关键依据，尤其是填第（ii）空和第（iii）空的依据。

我们把正确答案告诉大家：

Wolosky’s description (i)__fits__ the poetry of Gilman, Howe, and Harper, but it is not entirely (ii)__apt （恰当的）__ in the case of Wilcox, whohardly (iii)__impugned （置疑）__ the materialism of her time.

然后，一起来看看需要填空的这一句是什么意思：

Wolosky的描述（即题目的句）在G、H、H这三个人身上是准确的，但是在Wilcox（这个并不置疑她所处的时代的物质主义的人的）身上并不完全恰当。